The «История России» series. Video No. 4. East Slavs, the formation of Rus' (14.09.2025)
The fourth episode of the debunking cycle (a monologue in Russian): an analysis of Part 2 of the second volume of «История России» — “The East Slavs at the end of the 1st millennium AD. The formation of Rus’.” The central thesis: Russian historians systematically hide the history of Ukraine under the label “Eastern Europe” and make it part of the history of Russia, ignoring a well-known criterion — the history of a state is written within its present-day borders. The author records the edition’s self-contradictions: the list of early “towns” (Kyiv, Korosten, Polotsk) lies entirely outside the territory of the Russian Federation, and Moscow is not among them; the edition itself acknowledges that the basin of the Moskva River was “deserted” until the second half of the 11th century, and that the hypothesis of Ladoga as the “first capital of Rus’” (which appears in Medinsky’s school textbooks) received no confirmation. A source for the articles “How Russia rewrites history in its textbooks” and “How ‘Rus” became ‘Russia’.”
Key moments
- 00:39 Naryshkin — head of the Russian Historical Society since 2012, director of Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) since 2016, under EU/US/UK sanctions
- 00:32 Russian historians systematically 'pull' the history of Eastern Europe under the history of Russia
- 05:36 The list of 'towns' (Kyiv, Korosten, Polotsk…) — all outside the territory of the Russian Federation; Moscow is absent
- 22:59 The 'Old Rus' nationality' — an invention of Soviet historians (Yusova's dissertation, 2006)
- 24:55 The edition (p. 246): the hypothesis 'Ladoga — the first capital of Rus'' received no confirmation
- 26:41 The edition (p. 253): the basin of the Moskva River remained 'deserted' until the second half of the 11th c.
- 29:02 Medinsky's hand in school textbooks vs the academic text of the edition
- 30:27 Kyiv — the metropolis; the lands of present-day Russia — colonies that paid tribute to Kyiv